SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 5

A.S.ANAND, FAIZAN UDDIN
Jaishree Banerjee – Appellant
Versus
Abhirup Banerjee – Respondent


ORDER

1. The petitioner is the wife against whom a matrimonial case, HMA No. 489 of 1996, has been filed by the respondent-husband under Section l3(1) (i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. That case is pending in the Court of Additional District Judge, Delhi. The petitioner seeks transfer of that case from Delhi to a court of competent jurisdiction at Varanasi where the petitioner is staying with a child of the marriage, aged about two and a half years on various grounds detailed in the petition. That the child of the marriage is with the petitioner and cannot be left at Varanasi if the petitioner has to travel to attend to the matrimonial case, is not in dispute.

2. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, it appears appropriate to us to allow this application. HMA No. 489 of 1996 titled Abhirup Banerjee v. Jaishree Banerjee is withdrawn from the Court of Additional District t Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi and is transferred to the Court of the Presiding Officer, Family Court, Varanasi, for its trial in accordance with law. The Additional District Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi shall send the record of the case to the transferee court without delay. The transferee court

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top