ORDER

1. The ten respondents were engaged over the years on daily wages, and for different periods during each year, by the appellant Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission (Southern Region). Their services were discontinued with effect from 19-6-1993. They approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal") praying for their reinstatement and regularisation. The Tribunal by its judgment and order dated 21-10-1993 has directed reinstatement of the ten respondents and has also directed the Staff Selection Commission to frame a scheme for absorption of the respondents against Group "D" vacancies which exist or which may arise in their establishment and has given other directions in this connection. The appellant has come in appeal from this decision of the Tribunal.

2. It is the contention of the appellant that the appellant is already having regular employees for handling and processing the applications received by it in connection with various examinations conducted by it. When there is additional or extra work which is more than what the regular employees can handle, the appellant engages daily-rated casual workers for ha