SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 908

G.T.NANAVATI, S.C.AGRAWAL
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
V. R. Chadha – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. The respondent was appointed as Upper Division Clerk in the office of the Accountant General in the State of Madhya Pradesh on 21-11- 1955. The said appointment was on a temporary basis and the respondent was declared permanent with effect from 1-3-1960. He was subsequently appointed as S. S. Accountant with effect from 4-7-1961. While thus employed, he applied for the post of Accounts Executive in the Bokaro Steel Plant. The said application was forwarded through proper channel with the condition that in case he was selected he would have to resign finally within a period of two years beyond which his lien would not be retained in the parent office. On selection for the said post of Accounts Executive the respondent was relieved on 19-10-1967 and he tendered his resignation with effect from the date he was relieved from duty and the resignation was accepted with effect from 20-10-1967. He made a claim for pro rata retirement benefits for the period of service rendered by him in the Office of the Accountant. General from 21-11-1955 to 19-10-1967. The said claim of the respondent was not accepted. He, t











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top