SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 474

G.T.NANAVATI, S.C.AGRAWAL
U. P. State Road Transport Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Basudeo Chaudhary – Respondent


ORDER

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Allahabad Hi Court dated 15-10-1993 in Writ Petition No. 19349 of 1992 whereby the High Court has allowed the said writ petition filed by Respondent I. The facts, briefly stated, are as follows :

2. Basudeo Chaudhary, Respondent I herein, (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner") was employed as Conductor with the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "the Corporation"). Disciplinary proceedings were initiated againsr him on charges of misconduct and after conducting an inquiry wherein the charges were found proved, the petitioner was removed from service by order dated 17-4-1985. The said removal from service of the petitioner gave rise to an industrial dispute which was referred for adjudicanon to the Labour Court, Gorakhpur. Before the Labour Court, it was contended on behalf of the petitioner that the domestic inquiry was not fair and proper. The said plea of the petitioner was accepLed by the Labour Court and the Corpuration was permitted to adduce evidence to prove the charges. The Corporation adduced evidence, documentary as well as oral, in support of the charges before the Labour Co



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top