SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 87

G.T.NANAVATI, S.C.AGRAWAL
Rattan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


ORDER

1. The appellant, Rattan Singh, was employed as workman/head workman in Telephone Department, Sub-Division, Kurukshetra on daily- wage basis. His case is that he had worked during the period from 23- 10-1972 till 10-8-1976 and thereafter his services were discontinued. He filed a civil suit in the Court of Sub-Judge, Third Class, Ambala city for a declaration that the order terminating the services of the appellant was null and void. The said suit was dismissed by the trial court by judgment dated 25-2-1982. The appeal filed by the appellant was allowed by the Additional District Judge, Ambala, by judgment dated 22-1 - 1985, and the case was remanded to the trial court to record evidence on the additional issue framed by the appellate court and decide the matter in accordance with law. The said additional issue related to the question whether the department was duty-g bound to give one months notice in writing to the appellant before terminating his services as required by law under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act and, if so, to what effect. The High Court, in second appeal, vide judgment dated 5-8-1985, set aside the said orde


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top