SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 2097

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B N Kirpal, J S Verma
SHASHENDRA LAHRI, APPELLANT
VERSUS
UNICEF AND OTHERS, RESPONDENTS.
Civil Appeal No. 15567 of 1996 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 12212 of 1996), decided on December 6, 1996.

The assessment of compensation for permanent disability in motor accident cases should consider the adverse effect on the claimant's future prospects, especially in cases involving young individuals with promising academic careers.

Headnote:

Compensation - Motor Accident - Permanent Disability - Enhancement of Compensation

Fact of the Case:

The appellant suffered multiple injuries in a motor accident, resulting in permanent disability. The initial compensation awarded was deemed inadequate by the appellant, leading to the appeal for enhancement.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the total award of compensation was too inadequate for the permanent disability suffered by the claimant. Considering the age of the appellant at the time of the accident and his good academic career, the adverse effect of his permanent disability on his future prospects was assessed to be much more than that determined by the High Court. Therefore, the court awarded a further sum of Rs 4 lakhs in addition to the amount already awarded by the High Court.

Issues: Inadequacy of initial compensation, assessment of permanent disability, and the impact on future prospects.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the assessment of the adverse effect of the permanent disability on the appellant's future prospects, considering his age at the time of the accident and his academic career.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was awarded a further sum of Rs 4 lakhs with interest thereon at the rate of 12% per annum in addition to the amount already awarded by the High Court.

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. In a motor accident which occurred on 6-1-1977, the appellant Shashendra Lahri suffered multiple injuries which required his treatment as an indoor patient in a hospital at Bhopal and then in a Bombay hospital for a considerable period. The injuries caused several fractures and bone grafting was required to be done in Bombay. The appellant suffered permanent disability of shortening of his right leg by three inches. He was then a student of B. Com. aged about 17 years. It is common ground that the appellant thereafter continued his education and has a good academic career. The Tribunal awarded the sum of Rs 33,000 only with interest at the rate of 6% per annum towards the claim of more than Rs 6 lakhs by the appellant. The High Court has enhanced that amount to the total of Rs 58,000 with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the claim, until a payment. This further appeal by the claimant is for enhancement of that amount.

3. The narration of facts as above is sufficient to indicate that the total award of Rs 58,000 inclusive of the expenses, is too inadequate for the permanent disability suffered by the claimant. In the special leave petition, the appellant has said that the minimum enhancement of Rs 4 lakhs should have been made by the High Court in the facts and circumstances of the present case. In our opinion, this prayer of the appellant is quite reasonable. In view of the age of the appellant at the time of the accident and the prospects in view of his good academic career, the adverse effect of his permanent disability as a result of the motor accident on his future prospects, is much more than that assessed by the High Court. The award of a further sum of Rs 4 lakhs in addition to that awarded by the High Court is quite reasonable. In our opinion, enhancement of the amount of compensation to this extent has to be made at this stage.

4. For the above reasons, the appellant is awarded a further sum of Rs 4 lakhs with interest thereon at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the claim till the date of payment in addition to the amount already awarded by the High Court.

5. The appeal is allowed with costs Rs 5000.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top