SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 48

S.C.AGRAWAL, G.T.NANAVATI
Chairman And Managing Director, Andhra Bank – Appellant
Versus
Ramooramesh – Respondent


ORDER

1. We have heard the learned Additional Solicitor General in support of the application for restoration. Subject to the payment of Rs. 500 which amount has already been deposited by the petitioners and has been withdrawn by Respondent 1, the said application is allowed and the special leave petition is restored to its original position.

2. Taken on board.

3. Leave granted.

4. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Kerala High Court dated 28-10-1994 dismissing the appeal filed by the appellants against the judgment of the learned Single Judge in writ petition [OP No. 10338 of 1989 (E)] filed by the respondent. The facts briefly stated are as follows :

The respondent is employed with the Andhra Bank (hereinafter referred to as "the Bank") and, at the relevant time, he was posted as the Manager of Ernakulam Branch of the Bank. Certain irregularities were found in the conduct of accounts of certain parties in that branch and by order dated 29-8-1984, passed by the Assistant General Manager of the Bank, the respondent was placed under suspension. Thereafter, a charge-sheet dated 7-5-1985, containing 17 charges, was served on the respondent and disciplinary proceedings




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top