SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M Jagannadha Rao, Sujata V Manohar
H. S. GREWAL, PETITIONER
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS, RESPONDENTS.
Transferred Cases (C) No. 2 of 1996 with No. 3 of 1996 SLP (C) No. 7076 of 1995, T.Cs. (C) Nos. 9-13 and 41 of 1996 and W.P. (C) No. 98 of 1997, decided on August 27, 1997.
Constitution of India,1950 – Article 32 - Railway Protection Force (Superior Officers) Recruitment Rules, 1974 - Railway Protection Force (Group A and B Posts) Recruitment Rules, 1981- Suit for promotion - - Recruitment to post of Assistant Commandant - Cases raise common questions relating to seniority of officers in rank of Commandant/Security Officer/Assistant Inspector General Deputy Director/Divisional Security Officer - Rules which are relevant are the Railway Protection Force (Superior Officers) Recruitment Rules, 1974 and Railway Protection Force (Group A and B Posts) Recruitment Rules, 1981 - Before referring to the facts of cases it will be necessary to refer to hierarchy of posts and mode of recruitment and promotion under 1974 Rules as well as under the 1981 Rules and conditions for eligibility for promotions - Under 1974 Rules, hierarchy of posts was as follows - Initially recruitment was to post of Assistant Commandant/Assistant Security Officer in Class II, Group B in the pay scale - Further promotion from that post was to post of Commandant/Assistant Inspector General/Security Officer in the pay scale - Promotion was by way of selection through Departmental Promotion Committee and condition of eligibility was that a person should have put in 8 years of regular service in post of Assistant Commandant - So far as post of Assistant Commandant at lower level is concerned, said cadre was consisting of 30 direct recruits to that post and 60 promoters from a post which was below post of Assistant Commandant and 10 by way of transfer etc – Held, Learned counsel made a submission that notification in which Rules were published used words "except in respect of things done or omitted to be done" and that he was therefore governed by Rules in respect of examination conducted by virtue of advertisement - Court are unable to agree - Court do not have date of publication of results etc - In court view, offer of appointment in scale is very clear and it was accepted by petitioner without demur - Court do not find any merit in this writ petition - In other respects, his case will be governed by judgment and directions given above - TP No.]] of 1996 - Petitioner is aggrieved by provisional list and also by the seniority given to some Group A Officers - He filed the writ petition - He got further ad hoc promotions during pendency of writ petition - He claims that he should have been given these promotions on a regular basis and from anterior dates - Petitioner is about to retire in a few days - Learned counsel pointed out that for the last fifteen years, petitioners grievances have not been redressed and no DPCs were conducted - It was suggested to counsel that petitioner could submit a fresh representation within one month and the respondents could dispose of same as early as possible – Court direct accordingly - In other respects directions given in main judgment, to extent relevant, apply – All matters are disposed of accordingly.
JUDGMENT
M. JAGANNADHARAO, J. -Leave granted in SLP (C) No. 7076 of 1995.
2. These cases raise common questions relating to seniority of officers in the rank of Commandant/Security Officer/Assistant Inspector GeneralDeputy Director/Divisional Security Officer. The rules which are relevant are the Railway Protection Force (Superior Officers) Recruitment Rules, 1974 (hereinafter called "the 1974 Rules") and the Railway Protection Force (Group A and B Posts) Recruitment Rules, 1981 (hereinafter called "the 1981 Rules"). Eight writ petitions filed in various High Courts have been transferred to this Court and registered as transferred petitions, to be disposed of along with civil appeal arising out of the judgment of a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court on appeal from the judgment of a learned Single Judge of that court. We also have before us an independent Writ Petition No. 98 of 1997 filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.
3. Before referring to the facts of the cases it will be necessary to refer to the hierarchy of posts and the mode of recruitment and promotion under the 1974 Rules as well as under the 1981 Rules and the conditions for eligibility for promotions.
4. Under the 1974 Rules, the hierarchy of posts was as follows. Initially the recruitment was to the post of Assistant Commandant/Assistant Security Officer in Class II, Group B (hereinafter called generally as Assistant Commandant cadre for convenience) in the pay scale of Rs 350-900. Further promotion from that post was to the post of Commandant/Assistant Inspector General/Security Officer (Class I, Group A) in the pay scale of Rs 700-1250. The promotion was by way of selection through the Departmental Promotion Committee and the condition of eligibility was that a person should have put in 8 years of regular service in the post of Assistant Commandant. So far as the post of Assistant Commandant at the lower level is concerned, the said cadre was consisting of 30 direct recruits to that post and 60 promotees from a post which was below the post of Assistant Commandant and 10 by way of transfer etc. From the post of Commandant the further promotion was to the post of Deputy Chief Security Officer in Class I, Group A bearing a pay scale of Rs 1300-1600. The promotion was through the DPC and the condition of eligibility was that a person should have put in 5 years regular service as Commandant.
5. Under the 1981 Rules which came into force from 8-5-1981, direct recruitment to the post of Assistant Commandant (Group B, Class II) in the pay scale of Rs 650-1200 was completely stopped and the said post was to a be filled entirely by promotees below the post of Assistant Commandant. From the said post of Assistant Commandant (Group B, Class II) instead of direct promotion to the post of Commandant as was obtaining under the 1974 Rules, an intermediate post was created in Class I in the pay scale of Rs 700-1300 but the designation was the same namely Assistant Commandant/Assistant Security Officer. In the departmental communications, this is described as Group A, Class I, Junior Scale post. The recruitment to the intermediate post was 40 by promotion of Assistant Commandants who had put in 3 years of regular service. The promotion being from Class II to Class I the promotees had to go through the DPC. The remaining 60 in this intermediate post was to be filled up by direct recruitment throuhg the Union Public Service Commission. The next promotion from this intermedia post was to the post of commandant/Security Officer/Assistant Inspector General/Deputy Directed/Divisional Securty Officer (hereinafter generally called Commandants cadre for convenience). In the departmental communication this is described as Group A, Class I post, Senior scale.
6. For promotion as Commandant, Assistant Commandants in Group A, Class I are eligible under the 1981 Rules after 5 years of regular service. The promotion being from Class I to Class I there is no DPC. From
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.