B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, K.S.PARIPOORNAN
Addison And Company LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Collector Of Central Excise, Madras – Respondent
ORDER
1. Heard the counsel for the parties.
2. Two questions arise in these appeals namely (1) deductibility of turnover discount and (2) additional discount.
3. So far as the additional discount is concerned the matters have to go back to the Assistant Commissioner to ascertain the nature and character of the discount and determine its deductibility according to law.
4. So far as the turnover discount is concerned we are of the opinion that it has to be allowed in the light of the judgment of this Court in Govt. of India v. Madras Rubber Factory Ltd. [(1995) 4 SCC 349], (SCC at pp. 384-385, paras 49 to 51). In these cases also the turnover discount is provided as an incentive for the dealer to lift higher and higher the volume of goods. The rate of discount ascends according to the rise in the volume of purchases. For example, for Delhi City the figures are the following :
Annual Turnover Policy for all Types of Standard Cutting Tools
(Period : April 1988 to March 1989)
Applicable for the Dealers covered by :
DELHI CITY
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Turnover Slabs on Gross Value Turn
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.