SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1928

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, K.S.PARIPOORNAN
Ramniklal N. Bhutta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgement

B. P. JEEVAN REDDY, J. :- Leave granted.

2. This appeal is preferred against the order of the Bombay High Court dismissing the review petition filed by the appellant. The review petition was filed by the appellant against the order dismissing his writ petition by a Division Bench. The matter arises under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

3. By a notification dated November 29, 1979 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (the Act), two pieces of land were notified for acquisition for a public purpose, to wit, "for Bombay Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking for bus station". The two pieces of land notified are C. T. S. No. 218 admeasuring 1759 sq. mtrs, and C. T. S. No. 211 admeasuring 370 Sq. mtrs. The appellant claims to be the owner of CTS No. 211. The declaration under Section 6 was made on December 16, 1982. CTS No. 218 belongs to a Church but there are others who claim to have interest in the said laid, viz., Vijayanand Singh and Gayatri Darshan Cooperative Housing Society. The BEST entered into a settlement with the said two persons whereunder an extent of 906 sq. mtrs. was given on a perpetual lease to BEST free of any charge, i.e., Re. 1/- per












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top