SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 733

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
UNION OF INDIA
VERSUS
SUHRID GEIGY LIMITED
April 8, 1996

When a government employee is temporarily promoted to a post of greater importance, they are entitled to one advance increment in their old post in the time scale next above the substantive pay on the date of their temporary promotion.

Headnote:

Advance Increment - Scale of Pay - The court held that when a JBT Teacher is temporarily promoted as a Head Teacher, they are entitled to one advance increment in their old post in the time scale next above the substantive pay on the date of their temporary promotion as a Head Teacher.

Fact of the Case:

The respondents, JBT Teachers, were temporarily promoted as Head Teachers and claimed advance increment for discharging the duty as Head Teachers. The High Court construed that they are entitled to the advance increment as Head Teachers.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the JBT Teachers are entitled to one advance increment in their old post in the time scale next above the substantive pay on the date of their temporary promotion as Head Teachers, as they hold responsibilities of greater importance in the temporary role.

Issues: The controversy raised was for the advance increment and the scale of pay for the JBT Teachers.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Rule 4 (4) of the Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume I, Part I, and held that when a JBT Teacher is temporarily promoted as a Head Teacher, they are entitled to one advance increment in their old post in the time scale next above the substantive pay on the date of their temporary promotion as a Head Teacher.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the order of the High Court was modified. The JBT Teachers are entitled to one advance increment in the scale of JBT Teacher at the time of promotion while discharging the duties as Head Teachers. No costs were awarded.

JUDGMENT :- Delay condoned.

( 2 ) LEAVE granted.

( 3 ) WE have heard learned counsel on both sides.

( 4 ) THIS appeal by special leave arises from the order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, made on 2/11/1995 in C. W. P. No. 16409/92. The controversy raised is for the advance increment. In which scale of pay the respondents are entitled to advance increment is the question? Admittedly, the respondents were appointed on substantive posts of JBT Teachers and they were temporarily promoted as Head Teachers. The scale of pay for the JBT Teachers is Rs. 1200-2100. 00. They are discharging the duities temporarily as Head Teachers in the initial pay of Rs. 1410. 00. They claimed advance increment for discharging the duty as Head Teachers. The High Court has construed that they are entitled to the advance increment as Head Teachers. Rule 4 (4) of the Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume I, Part I which reads as under:

"4. 4 The initial substantive pay of a Government employee who is appointed substantively to a post on a time-scale of pay is regulated as follows:

(I) When appointment to the new post involves the assumption of duties or responsibilities of greater importance (as interpreted for the purpose of Rule 4. 13) than these attaching to such permanent post, he will draw as initial pay the stage of the time-scale next above his substantive pay in respect of the old post;"

( 5 ) A reading thereof would clearly indicate that initial substantive pay of a Government employee who is appointed substantively to a post on a time-scale of pay, is regulated, if he holds a lien on a permanent post, other than a tenure post and when appointment to the new post involves the assumption of duities or responsibilities of greater importance, then he will draw as initial pay the stage of the time scale next above his substantive pay in respect of the old post. Thus, it could be seen that when JBT Teacher was appointed temporarily as a Head Teacher, he is entitled to draw, since he is holding responsibilities of greater importance as a Head Teacher, one advance increment in his old post in the time scale next above the substantive pay on the date of his temporarily promotion as a Head Teacher.

( 6 ) THE appeal is accordingly allowed. The order of the High Court stands modified. They are entitled to one advance increment in the sale of JBT Teacher at the time of promotion while discharging the duties as Head Teachers. No costs. Appeal allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top