SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 733

D.P.WADHWA, M.K.MUKHERJEE
Ram Sunder Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M.K.MUKHERJEE, JJ.

(1) ONE of the questions which requires our answer in these appeals is whether the prosecution is obliged to explain the injuries sustained by the accused in the same occurrence and whether failure of the prosecution to so explain would mean that the prosecution has suppressed the truth and also the origin and genesis of the occurrence. Since this court has taken divergent views on these points, as would appear from the cases referred to in the judgment of this court in Hare Krishna Singh v. State of Bihar besides others, we feel that the point should be settled by a larger bench. Let these papers be placed before the learned chief justice for necessary orders. court Masters

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top