SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 1041

A.P.MISRA, G.B.PATTANAIK
Pritpal Singhal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Nct Of Delhi – Respondent


(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) HEARD learned Senior Counsel, Mr R.K. Jain, appearing for the appellant and Mr N.N. Goswami and Mr K.T.S. Tuisi, appearing for the 9 respondent.

(3) THE appellant has been convicted under S. 302/34 Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced for life. He is more than 70 years old and he is already in custody for more than 7 1/2 years. In the High court, a prayer for suspension of sentence was made but the learned Judges examining the gravity of the offence and prima facie merit of the case, were not inclined to suspend the sentence by their order dated 20/1/1998 and on the other hand, granted liberty to the accused for praying for early hearing of the appeal. Though six months have expired since then and knowing the workload in the Delhi High Court, it is not possible to visualise that the appeal will be heard in the near future, the appeal being of 1997. Taking into account the age of the appellant and that he is in custody for more than 7 1/2 years, we think in the interest of justice to release the appellant on bail in the sum of Rs 50,000.00 with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top