SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 582

J.JAGANNADHA RAO, S.P.BHARUCHA
Government Of Orissa – Appellant
Versus
Hanichal Roy – Respondent


(1) WE need not dilate upon the facts in this appeal by special leave against an order of the orissa Administrative tribunal. Special leave, it may be mentioned, was granted only in regard to the two respondents herein. They had put in approximately one and a half years service, but on ad hoc basis. Taking into account the circumstances in which they had so served, the tribunal held that it found no reason why there should not be a relaxation of the appropriate rule for regularisation of their service and ordered accordingly.

(2) THE Rule that is relevant reads thus:

"14. Relaxation.-When the government are of opinion that it is necessary or expedient so to do, it may by order, for reasons to be recorded in writing, relax any of the provisions of these Rules in respect of any class or category of persons in public interest."

(3) THE Rule requires the government to form the opinion, for reasons to be recorded in writing, that it is necessary or expedient to relax any of the provisions of the Rules in public interest in respect of any class or category of persons. We assume for the purposes of this appeal that the case of the respondents herein falls within


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top