SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 658

G.B.PATTANAIK, UMESH C.BANERJEE
State Of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Nilmani Sahu – Respondent


(1) THESE are applications by sitting Judge of Patna High Court who feels aggrieved by some observations made by this Court in disposing of a Special Leave Petition arising out of a Land Acquisition proceedings. The State of Bihar is represented by Mr. B. B. Singh. Mr. Dipanakar Gupta, learned senior Counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the expression "we find that the view taken by the learned single Judge, Justice R. K. Dev, with due respect, if we can say so, is most atrocious" casts stigma against the applicant and in fact it was not necessary for the decision. We need not go into the merits of the matter since that has reached finality. But having heard the learned Counsel for the parties and considering the judgment of this Court, we think possibly the expression "we find that the view taken by the learned single Judge, Justice P. K. Dev, with due respect, if we can say so, is most atrocious", in the judgment is wholly inappropriate. When this Court) uses an expression against the judgment off High Court it must be in keeping with the dignity of the person concerned. Mr. Singh, learned counsel appearing for the State of Bihar fairly stated that the express

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top