SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 742

A.P.MISRA, K.VENKATASWAMI
Tariff Advisory Committee – Appellant
Versus
Hajjan Nanhi – Respondent


ORDER

SLP (C) No. 8674 of 1998

1. We do not think that at this stage, we should interfere. The petitioner can move the High Court for appropriate relief. We have no doubt that having regard to the circumstances, the High Court will expeditiously dispose of the interim applications. The special leave petition is dismissed.

IPs (C) Nos. 517-522 of 1998

2. These transfer petitions are filed under Article 139-A of the Constitution of India to transfer the writ applications filed in different High Courts by operators of stage carriages and others challenging Section 64-UC of the Insurance Act, 1938, and also the enhancement of motor tariff insurance premium ranging between 182.75% to 244% of the existing tariff to be paid by the transport operators and also the exercise of powers of the Central Government under Section 35 of the General Insurance Corporation Act. It is stated by the learned Attorney General that in the judgment in Jt. Council of Bus Syndicate v. Union of India [1992 Supp (2) SCC 125] the questions raised in various High Courts stand concluded leaving no scope for further arguments. In the circumstances, the learned Attorney General prays for transfer of some of the case




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top