SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 641

G.B.PATTANAIK, SUJATA V.MANOHAR, A.P.MISRA, S.B.MAJMUDAR
Sheela Devi – Appellant
Versus
Jaspal Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT :- Leave granted.

2. No reason has been given by the respondent for not availing of the remedy of revision under Section 18 of the U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972. The respondent straightway filed a writ petition before the High Court where the High Court had re-examined the facts. The impugned 2860 order of the High Court is set aside. The respondent will be at liberty to avail of the alternate remedy of revision, if he so desires.

3. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Order accordingly

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top