SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 538

A.M.AHMADI, K.S.PARIPOORNAN, S.P.KURDUKAR
Brajendra Nath Bhargava – Appellant
Versus
Ramchandra Kasliwal – Respondent


JUDGMENT :- The appellant is the original complainant who had lodged a complaint with the Bar Council of Rajasthan, Jodhpur against the respondents who were then practising as advocates in the Courts in Rajasthan. The complainant happened to be a tenant of a show room. His landlords had filed the suit against him for arrears of rent and possession on 21-12-1974. S/Sh. K. L. Saxena and Satyandra Saxena represented the plaintiffs in that suit. Later on, the two respondents appeared on behalf of the plaintiffs. A standard rent suit was filed by the landlord represented by the two respondents against the complainant bearing No. 36 of 1978 and that suit was later decreed and the standard rent was fixed at Rs. 300/- per month. Thereafter, it is alleged that the respondents got the show room transferred in the name of respondent R. C. Kashliwals sons, Sarvshri Harshwardhan and Himanshu and Smt. Ritu Kashliwal. The allegation was that the vendees were non-earning members of the family of the two respondents and were, therefore, benamidars. The two respondents continued to represent them in the suit even after the transaction. The two respondents have admitted the fact of the institution of





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top