SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 657

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.N. KIRPAL AND A.P. MISRA, JJ.
The Yadavindra Public School Association, Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 3376 of 1998 (arising out of S. L. P. (C) No. 21043 of 1997), D/- 17-7-1998.

Opportunity to respondent to file an affidavit and decide the case on merits when serious allegations of mala fides are raised.

Headnote:

Mala Fides - Writ Petition - Opportunity to Respondent - Setting Aside High Court Judgment

Fact of the Case:

Serious allegations of mala fides raised in the writ petition. High Court dismissed the writ petition without notice to the respondent.

Finding of the Court:

The court found it inappropriate for the High Court to dismiss the writ petition without giving an opportunity to the respondent to file an affidavit and decide the case on merits. The judgment of the High Court was set aside, and the case was restored to the file of the High Court for decision in accordance with the law. Appellant should not be dispossessed pending disposal of the writ petition.

Issues: Allegations of mala fides, dismissal of writ petition without notice to respondent.

Ratio Decidendi: When serious allegations of mala fides are raised and the person against whom the allegations are made has been impleaded as a respondent, it is appropriate to give an opportunity to the person concerned to file an affidavit and then decide the case on merits.

Final Decision: Judgment of the High Court set aside, and the case restored to the file of the High Court for decision in accordance with the law. Appellant should not be dispossessed pending disposal of the writ petition.

JUDGMENT :- Leave granted.

2. Considering that serious allegations of mala fides have been raised in the writ petition, it was not appropriate, in our opinion, for the High Court to have dismissed the writ petition by a detailed order in limine and without notice. When such allegations of mala fides are raised and the person against whom the allegations are made has been impleaded as a respondent it would be appropriate to give an opportunity to the person concerned to file an affidavit and then to decide the case on merits. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case, we set aside the judgment of the High Court and restore the CWP No. 16047/97 to the file of the High Court for decision in accordance with law. Pending disposal of the writ petition the appellant should not be dispossessed.

Order accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top