SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1503

V.N.KHARE, S.RAJENDRA BABU, Y.K.SABHARWAL, S.P.BHARUCHA
Collector Of Central Excise, Meerut – Appellant
Versus
Surya Roshni LTD. – Respondent


( 1 ). The respondent manufactures electric bulbs and tubes. The bulbs and tubes are sold for destination. The price charged includes two per cent towards transit risk insurance. For the purposes of the assessable value of the bulbs and tubes, the respondent claimed a deduction on account of equalized freight based on the elements of transportation charges, insurance charges, octroi and taxes. The respondent filed a statement of actual expenses for the year in question, namely, 1994-95, duly certified by a Cost Accountant. It showed that the deduction on account of insurance charges was actually on account of "transit losses/breakages replenished to customers". The deduction on this account, claimed in the sum of Rs. 1,05,79,909, was disallowed by the assessing authority and in appeal. The Central Excise and gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, however, in a brief order, said that transit insurance was eligible for deduction while determining assessable value according to its earlier orders. It, therefore, allowed the appeal.

( 2 ). The learned Attorney-General appearing for the appellant submitted that what was in question was actually compensation for breakages or losses sustained





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top