1. High Court quashed an FIR on the grounds that allegations were absurd without discussing the averments made in the complaint. (Para 4 )
Back
Next 
2000 Supreme(SC) 1365
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
State of Haryana
Vs.
Bhim Sain
Decided on August 18, 2000
Important Points
The court highlighted that the stage for quashing the FIR was not appropriate, and it emphasized the investigating officer's role in filing a report or charge-sheet based on the FIR allegations.
Subject
Criminal Law - Quashing of FIR
Act Referred
Headnote
DELAY - Quashing of FIR - Failure to consider the FIR lodged at the behest of the victim's father - Direction for filing charge-sheet and granting exemption from personal appearance
Fact of the Case:
The High Court quashed the FIR without considering the allegations made in the complaint, which was lodged at the behest of the victim's father.
Finding of the Court:
The court set aside the impugned order and directed that if a charge-sheet is submitted against the respondents, they can file an application for exemption from personal appearance, subject to certain conditions.
Issues: Failure to consider the FIR allegations, quashing of the FIR, and granting of exemption from personal appearance.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the stage for quashing the FIR was not appropriate, as it is open to the investigating officer to file a report or charge-sheet after investigation based on the FIR allegations.
Final Decision: The impugned order was quashed and set aside, with a direction for the respondents to file an application for exemption from personal appearance if a charge-sheet is submitted against them.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Table of Contents
2. Whether an FIR can be quashed as absurd before the investigating officer files a report or charge-sheet based on the allegations. (Para 4 )
3. The High Court failed to consider the FIR lodged by the victim's father and quashed the proceedings prematurely. (Para 4 )
4. An FIR should not be quashed before the investigating officer has the opportunity to file a report or charge-sheet based on the allegations. (Para 4 )
5. Order quashing FIR set aside; accused granted conditional possibility of exemption from personal appearance upon filing of charge-sheet. (Para 5 )
6. Can an FIR be quashed before the completion of the investigation?
No, it is generally not the appropriate stage for quashing an FIR as the investigating officer must first be allowed to file the appropriate report or charge-sheet based on the allegations made in the FIR. (Para 4 )
7. Is quashing an FIR based on the absurdity of allegations permissible without analyzing the complaint's averments?
No, quashing an FIR on the ground that allegations are absurd without discussing the averments made in the complaint or considering the FIR is improper. (Para 4 )
8. Under what conditions can a trial court grant exemption from personal appearance to an accused?
Exemption may be granted if the accused agrees not to dispute their identity, ensures a counsel is present on posting dates, and makes themselves available whenever their presence is required by the court. (Para 5 )
( 1 ) DELAY condoned.
( 2 ) LEAVE granted.
( 3 ) HEARD the learned Counsel for the parties.
( 4 ) WITHOUT there being any discussion with regard to the averments made in the complaint, the High Court quashed the FIR on the ground that the allegations made against four persons were absurd. In our view, this reason given by the High Court is without considering the FIR lodged at the behest of the father of the victim. In any case, this was not the stage for quashing the FIR as it is open to the investigating officer to file the appropriate report or charge-sheet after investigation on the basis of the allegations made in the FIR.
( 5 ) IN this view of the matter, the impugned order, dated 13. 7. 1999, passed in Cri. Misc. No. 28820/m/1998 is quashed and set aside. However, it is directed that in case charge-sheet is submitted against respondent nos. 3 to 6, i. e. , Dalip, Inder Kumar, Harbans Singh and Giano Devi, it would be open to them to file proper application before the trial court for grant of exemption from personal appearance and the trial court would grant the same on the conditions that they would not dispute their identity as particular accused in that case, a Counsel on their behalf will be present on such posting dates; and they would make themselves available on any date when their presence is needed in that case. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
