SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 52

K.RAMASWAMY, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Lokraj – Appellant
Versus
Kishan Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
K.Madhava Reddy, K.RAM KUMAR, Pramit Saxena, S.R.Setia, S.V.DESHPANDEY

( 1 ) THIS appeal by special leave arises from the division bench judgment dated 22/1/1986 made in CRP No. 1215 of 1977 of the High court of A. P. . The respondent-plaintiff laid the suit OS No. 59 of 1968 in the court of the Chief Judge, City Civil court, Hyderabad for partition of the plaint schedule properties and for l/6th share therein. We are concerned in this appeal with the properties mentioned in b Schedule of the plaint. It consists of 8 items, of which item 5 relates to lands bearing Survey Nos. 174, 175, 179, 192, 193 and 205 admeasuring 20 acres 21 gunthas situated in Attapur Village. The said land was acquired by the government to establish a zoo. The compensation was determined in OP No. 35 of 1963 by the First Additional Judge, City Civil court, Hyderabad. The rest of the properties are now found to be inam lands as per the finding of the High court:

"thus, there does not appear to be any controversy between the parties on the question whether the plaint b Schedule properties are inam lands or not. Therefore, it becomes an admitted fact that the plaint b schedule lands are inam lands. "

( 2 ) ON those admitted facts, the division bench proceeded to consider whether th








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top