SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 533

A.M.AHMADI, S.P.BHARUCHA
All India Judges Association – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


( 1 ) BY our judgment in review petitions rendered on 24/8/1993 (All India Judges Assn. v. Union of India, the date of compliance of certain directions issued earlier by the judgment of 13-11-1991 ( All India Judges Assn. v. Union of India, came to be extended up to 31/3/1994 more than a year has since passed. We find that the directions have not been complied with fully by most of the States. That is presumably because it has not been possible for the State governments to construct sufficient houses for judicial officers even though some of the State governments have granted administrative approvals and sanctioned funds for grant thereof. However, that may take some time but in the meantime some arrangement ought to be made because the question of residential accommodation to judicial officers is a first priority requirement. What the interim arrangement should be is a matter in regard to which we have heard counsel for the respective State Governments. In the case of the State of Gujarat we had on an earlier occasion, i. e. , on 19-8-1994, passed an order to the effect that the judicial officer should be granted residential accommodation of the standard to which they are entitled





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top