SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1055

K.RAMASWAMY, B.N.KIRPAL
E. Gopalakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
A.D.N.Rao, A.N.JAYARAM, ARVIND SHARMA, C.V.SUBBA RAO, K.SWAMY, S.SUNDARAVARADAN

( 1 ) THE appellants, nine in number, admittedly had retired prior to 1/09/1985 as either head clerks or chief clerks, the last being 30/06/1985. It appears that a practice was vogue at one point of time that for the discharge of special duties, a sum of Rs. 35. 00 p. m. as special pay was granted to the upper division clerks working in certain special posts. Decision was taken that on promotion as head clerk or special clerk, they would not be entitled to carry with them the special pay of Rs. 35. 00 per month. Admittedly, the appellants had been promoted, as stated earlier, as head clerks or chief clerks and they were not given the special pay of Rs. 35. 00 per month from the date of their promotion as head clerk or special clerk, they would not be entitled to carry with them the special pay of Rs. 35. 00 per month from the date of their promotion till the date of their retirement prior to 1/09/1985. It is also clear that in the memo dated 11/07/1979, it was expressly stated that the special pay would not be paid to the promoted head clerks or chief clerks. subsequently, it appears that there was an agitation and a reference to the Board of Arbitration was made which had decided



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top