SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1085

B.L.HANSARIA, K.RAMASWAMY
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Narges K. Panthaky – Respondent


Advocates:
DUSHYANT A.DAVE, H.VAHI, NILAM KAISI, R.P.BHATT, VIMAL DAVE

( 1 ) LEAVE granted.

( 2 ) THE proceedings were initiated under the Gujarat Agricultural Lands Ceiling Act, 1960 (for short, "the Act") to determine the ceiling area and the surplus area. The respondent claimed that under an agreement dated 14/10/1969, thirty acres of land had been transferred in favour of the respondents mother which was duly recognised by mutation proceedings dated 15-9-1971. The question is whether it is to defeat the provision of the Act. Sub-section (1) of S. 8 of the Act reads thus:

"8. Transfers or partitions made after 15/01/1959 but before commencement of this Act. (1) Where after 15th day of January, 1959 but before the commencement of this Act or after 24th day of January, 1971, but before the specified date, any person has transferred whether by sale, gift, mortgage, with possession, exchange lease, surrender or otherwise or partitioned any land held by him, then notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force such transfer or partition shall, unless it is proved to the contrary, be deemed to have been made in anticipation in order to defeat the object of this Act. Where such transfer or partition was made after 15th day of Janu


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top