SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1884

K.VENKATASWAMI, S.P.BHARUCHA
Prabhat Sound Studios – Appellant
Versus
Additional Collector Of Central Excise – Respondent


( 1 ) THE appeal is directed against the order of a full bench of the customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate tribunal, New Delhi. Two learned Members held against the appellant-assessee and one Member held in its favour.

( 2 ) IT is not in dispute that the appellant, on job-work basis, recorded sound on magnetic cassette tapes or spool magnetic tapes, these tapes being supplied by the customer. The majority view of the tribunal was that the appellant was engaged in the manufacture of goods which were excisable under Item 59 of the central Excise Tariff. The dissenting Member took the view that no manufacture was involved.

( 3 ) TARIFF Item 59, so far as it is relevant, reads thus:

"59. Articles of a kind used for sound or sound and image recording, whether recorded or not, namely:

(1 Magnetic tapes of. . . tapes,

(2 Sound recorded. . . tapes.

(3 Cassette tapes for sound recording.

(4 Sound recorded cassette tapes. "

( 4 ) THE majority judgment of the tribunal does not appear to have discussed how the recording of sound on such tapes could constitute manufacture for the purposes of Tariff Item 59. The dissenting Member has gone into the issue, squarely framed by him, in considerab





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top