SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
COLLECTOR OF central EXCISE
Vs.
RAM BODY BUILDERS
Decided on September 2, 1997
Excise Tariff - Classification of Bodies for Buses and Trucks - The bodies built on chassis supplied by customers fall under Heading No. 87. 07 of the central Excise Tariff and are entitled to exemption from excise duty under Notification No. 175 of 1986.
Fact of the Case:
The respondents are small-scale manufacturers building bodies for buses or trucks on chassis supplied by customers. The question is whether the bodies are classifiable under Heading No. 87. 07 or under Headings Nos. 87. 02 and 87. 04 of the central Excise Tariff.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court and the tribunal held that the bodies fall under Heading No. 87. 07 and are entitled to exemption from excise duty. The court agreed with this view and dismissed the appeals and special leave petitions.
Issues: Classification of bodies for buses and trucks under the central Excise Tariff, entitlement to exemption from excise duty under Notification No. 175 of 1986.
Ratio Decidendi: Bodies built on chassis supplied by customers fall under Heading No. 87. 07 of the central Excise Tariff and are entitled to exemption from excise duty under Notification No. 175 of 1986.
Final Decision: The appeals and special leave petitions are dismissed. The tribunal's decision on the imposition of excise duty at Rs. 4000.00 per vehicle remains undisturbed.
( 1 ) IN these matters the respondents are small-scale manufacturers who build or fabricate only bodies for buses or trucks on chassis supplied by their customers. The question that falls for consideration in these appeals and special leave petitions is whether the bodies so manufactured are classifiable under Heading No. 87. 07 or under Headings Nos. 87. 02 and 87. 04 of the central Excise Tariff. If the bodies are held to be classifiable under Heading no. 87. 07 the same would be entitled to exemption from excise duty under notification No. 175 of 1986 dated 1/3/1986. The division bench of the high Court of Punjab and Haryana by its judgment dated 19-12-1989 under challenge in Special Leave Petitions (C) Nos. 15606-08 of 1991 has held that the bodies were " covered by Heading No. 87. 07 as claimed by the assessee and not byheadings Nos, 87. 02 and 87. 04 as claimed by the Revenue. The same view has been taken by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate a tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "the tribunal") in various judgments which are under challenge in these appeals. Civil No. 531 of 1994 as well as in Civil No. 2138 of 1989 filed by the Revenue against the judgments of the tribunal taking the same view have been dismissed by this court. We have heard the learned counsel for the Revenue and we have perused the impugned judgments. We are in agreement with the views of the b High court as well as of the tribunal that the bodies which are built on chassis supplied by the customers would fall under Heading No. 87. 07 of the central Excise Tariff and would be entitled to exemption from excise duty under Notification No. 175 of 1986 dated 1/3/1986. The appeals as well as the special leave petitions are, therefore, dismissed. Civil No. 2822 of 1987
( 2 ) IN Civil No. 2822 of 1987 the tribunal has held that the respondents are liable to pay excise duty Rs. 4000. 00 per vehicle on the basis of Notification No. 279 of 1986 dated 24/4/1986. The respondent has not challenged the said view of the tribunal and has paid the duty as per the said decision. While dismissing the above appeal filed by the Revenue, it is made clear that the impugned judgment of the tribunal insofar as it relates to imposition of excise duty as 4000. 00 per vehicle will remain undisturbed. No costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.