SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 292

S.C.AGRAWAL, M.SRINIVASAN, A.P.MISRA
Ashgar Khan – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


( 1 ). Delay condoned.

( 2 ). Special leave granted.

( 3 ) WE have heard the learned counsel for the parties. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Jodhpur bench of the Rajasthan High court dated 22/5/1996 whereby the division bench of the High court has dismissed the special appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment of the learned Single Judge on the writ petition filed by him. The only questionwhich arises for consideration in the writ petition of the appellant was with regard to his date of birth. The case of the appellant was that his date of birth as recorded in the service record was 30/11/1932 but he was being retired a from the service on the basis that his date of birth was 1/7/1926. The learned single Judge by his order dated 8/9/1994 dismissed the writ petition on the view that even on the basis of 30/11/1932, the date of birth claimed by the appellant, he would have retired on 30/11/1990 and since that date has already passed the writ petition had been rendered infructuous. The said view of the learned Single Judge has been affirmed by the division bench in special appeal.

( 4 ) IN our opinion, the fact that during the pendency of the writ petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top