SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 429

A.S.ANAND, B.N.KIRPAL, S.P.BHARUCHA
Narmada Bachao Andolan – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


( 1 ) DURING the course of hearing, Mr Narirnan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the State of Gujarat, referred us to a compilation containing the details at the Randr sites for the project-affected families of Madhya Pradesh, resettled in Gujarat. After perusing some of the charts relating to different Randr sites out of the 41 relief and rehabilitation sites, he submitted that it appeared to him that there were still some deficiencies in providing civic amenities at those relief and rehabilitation sites as per the norms prescribed by the NWDT Award. These deficiencies, it was submitted, were found particularly in the matter of providing primary schools, dispensaries, drinking and other water and children parks. Mr Nariman submitted that he shall identify all such deficiencies in different Randr sites and file a composite chart in this court and that the State government shall take steps to remove those deficiencies so that all civic amenities, as envisaged by the NWDT Award are made available at the earliest. He, therefore, requested for a short adjournment.

( 2 ) MR Nariman brought to our notice that the petitioners have celebrated the "4th anniversary of the stoppage of wo



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top