A.S.ANAND, B.N.KIRPAL, S.P.BHARUCHA
Narmada Bachao Andolan – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
( 1 ) DURING the course of hearing, Mr Narirnan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the State of Gujarat, referred us to a compilation containing the details at the Randr sites for the project-affected families of Madhya Pradesh, resettled in Gujarat. After perusing some of the charts relating to different Randr sites out of the 41 relief and rehabilitation sites, he submitted that it appeared to him that there were still some deficiencies in providing civic amenities at those relief and rehabilitation sites as per the norms prescribed by the NWDT Award. These deficiencies, it was submitted, were found particularly in the matter of providing primary schools, dispensaries, drinking and other water and children parks. Mr Nariman submitted that he shall identify all such deficiencies in different Randr sites and file a composite chart in this court and that the State government shall take steps to remove those deficiencies so that all civic amenities, as envisaged by the NWDT Award are made available at the earliest. He, therefore, requested for a short adjournment.
( 2 ) MR Nariman brought to our notice that the petitioners have celebrated the "4th anniversary of the stoppage of wo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.