SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 429

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
NARMADA BACHAO ANDOLAN
Vs.
Union of India
Decided on March 31, 1998

The court emphasized the importance of complying with the norms prescribed by the NWDT Award in providing civic amenities and completing the resettlement and rehabilitation without any hindrance.

Headnote:

Civic Amenities - Resettlement and Rehabilitation - The court addressed deficiencies in providing civic amenities at relief and rehabilitation sites for project-affected families, emphasizing the need to comply with the norms prescribed by the NWDT Award.

Fact of the Case:

During the hearing, concerns were raised about deficiencies in providing civic amenities at relief and rehabilitation sites for project-affected families, and the celebration of the stoppage of work by the petitioners.

Finding of the Court:

The court emphasized the importance of completing the resettlement and rehabilitation without any hindrance and discouraged actions that could delay the process.

Issues: Deficiencies in providing civic amenities, celebration of stoppage of work, and ensuring completion of resettlement and rehabilitation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court stressed the need to address deficiencies in providing civic amenities and discouraged actions that could hinder the completion of resettlement and rehabilitation.

Final Decision: The matter was listed for directions on a future date, and the parties were directed to take necessary steps to address the deficiencies and ensure completion of the resettlement and rehabilitation.

( 1 ) DURING the course of hearing, Mr Narirnan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the State of Gujarat, referred us to a compilation containing the details at the Randr sites for the project-affected families of Madhya Pradesh, resettled in Gujarat. After perusing some of the charts relating to different Randr sites out of the 41 relief and rehabilitation sites, he submitted that it appeared to him that there were still some deficiencies in providing civic amenities at those relief and rehabilitation sites as per the norms prescribed by the NWDT Award. These deficiencies, it was submitted, were found particularly in the matter of providing primary schools, dispensaries, drinking and other water and children parks. Mr Nariman submitted that he shall identify all such deficiencies in different Randr sites and file a composite chart in this court and that the State government shall take steps to remove those deficiencies so that all civic amenities, as envisaged by the NWDT Award are made available at the earliest. He, therefore, requested for a short adjournment.

( 2 ) MR Nariman brought to our notice that the petitioners have celebrated the "4th anniversary of the stoppage of work" and submitted that this type of celebration comes in the way of completing the Randr and encourages the PAFs not to avail of the Randr facilities. If what Mr Nariman has stated is correct, it is unfortunate. The interim orders made by this court are meant to be in aid of justice. The orders of this court cannot be permitted to be exploited by anybody. The petitioners shall henceforth see that no such action is taken by them which comes in the way of completing the Randr at the sites and no celebrations of the type mentioned by Mr Nariman are undertaken. Mr Prashant Bhushan appearing for NBA assures us that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly give any cause for concern by this court.

( 3 ) MR Andhyarujina, learned Solicitor General appearing for the State of Maharashtra, submits that the Randr facilities in the State of Maharashtra have been provided as per the norms prescribed by the NWDT Award, except for some minor deficiencies in the matter of irrigation facilities, dispensaries and appointment of teachers in the primary schools. He submits that remedial steps shall be taken to overcome all these deficiencies and an affidavit shall be filed in this court before the next date of hearing. Let the needful be done.

( 4 ) LIST the matter on 16/4/1998 at 3. 00 p. m. for directions.

COURT Masters

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top