SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 168

B.N.KIRPAL, S.P.KURDUKAR
Agasthyar Trust, Madras – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Madras – Respondent


( 1 ) IN these appeals relating to Assessment Years 1957-58 to 1974-75, the main question which is involved for consideration is whether the appellant- trust being a public charitable trust, is eligible for exemption from income tax.

( 2 ) ON 28/11/1941, a partnership deed was executed between K. Rajagopal and V. S. Nanjappa Chettiar. By this document, the said parties a agreed to carry on business in partnership but clauses (4 to (8 of the deed contained an agreement amongst the partners that out of the net profits of the business, after payment of all charges and expenses, 80 per cent shall be set apart and allotted to charitable and religious objects. The amounts which were to be credited to the Charity Account in the books of business were to be utilised by the trustee for carrying out the objects of the Trust. The partnership deed appointed one T. N. Venkatarama Chettiar, son of one of thepartners as the sole trustee. The power which was given to the said sole trustee was contained in para 8 of the deed which reads as follows:

"the said T. N. Venkatarama Chettiar shall from time to time after acceptance of the Trust, operate on the fund in execution of the Trust and spend out o


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top