SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1524

K.VENKATASWAMI, S.C.AGRAWAL, V.N.KHARE
Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


( 1 ). In pursuance of the direction contained in the order dated 12/8/1997 the petitioner has filed an application for amendment of the writ petition. The said application is allowed and the amendments sought are permitted to be made. Shri Muralidhar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, will file the amended copy of the writ petition within two weeks.

( 2 ). In pursuance of the directions contained in the order dated 14/10/19977, an affidavit of shri Bir Singh, Under-Secretary to the government of India in the Ministry of Law and Justice has been filed on behalf of the Union of India. We have perused the said affidavit. It appears that while the provisions of the Act except Ch. III have been extended to all the States vide notification dated 9/11/1995, the provisions of Ch. III have not been extended to a number of States and Union Territories for the reason that for the purpose of extending the provisions of Ch. III, it is necessary that the State government/union Territory Administration concerned should have framed the relevant rules under Section 28 of the Act. It has been stated that since rules have not been framed in certain States/union Territories, provisions of Ch. I


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top