SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1855

N.P.SINGH, S.B.MAJMUDAR
Authorised Officer – Appellant
Versus
M. M. Krishnamurthychetty – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS appeal has been filed on behalf of the Authorised Officer under the Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling of Land) Act, 1961 for setting aside the judgment of the learned Judge of the High court of Madras. It appears that about 4. 81 standard acres of lands belonging to the respondent were declared surplus. Ultimately the matter came to the High court. A learned Judge of the High court set aside the orders passed by the authorities concerned and remanded the case for fresh consideration in the light of the judgment of the High court in the case of Naganatha Ayyar v. Authorised Officer. While the matter was pending before the Authorised officer this court reversed the aforesaid judgment in Naganathu Ayyar v. Authorised Officer in the case of Authorised Officer v. S. Naganatha ayyar. The Authorised Officer decided the ceiling proceedings in the light of the judgment of this court. The landholder went in revision before the high court challenging the order of the Authorised Officer. A stand was taken before the High court that the order of remand passed by the High court directing the Authorised Officer to decide the dispute in respect of the ceiling area in the ligh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top