SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1592

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
COLLECTOR OF central EXCISE, Madras
Vs.
ABEX RUBBER COMPANY
Decided on December 4, 1997

Presumption of bulk sales at wholesale prices to industrial consumers must be based on the facts of the case, and there is no automatic presumption in law.

Headnote:

wholesale - sale of thread rubber and rubber compounds - The court held that the sale to a single consumer cannot be considered wholesale unless it is in bulk, and there is no presumption that sales to industrial consumers are in bulk at wholesale prices.

Fact of the Case:

The dispute was whether the sale of thread rubber and rubber compounds by the assessee to the consumers was retail or wholesale. The Revenue contended that the sales were wholesale due to the large quantity of goods and the industrial consumers.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there was no evidence of bulk sales at wholesale prices to industrial consumers and upheld the tribunal's conclusion. The appeal was dismissed.

Issues: Dispute over whether the sales were retail or wholesale, and whether sales to industrial consumers were presumed to be in bulk at wholesale prices.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that there is no presumption that sales to industrial consumers are in bulk at wholesale prices, and such inference must be drawn from the facts of the case.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and no order was made as to costs.

( 1 ) THE dispute in this case is whether the sale of thread rubber and rubber compounds by the assessee to the consumers was retail or wholesale. There is no dispute that the assessee was selling directly to the consumers. It has been contended on behalf of the Revenue that the sale to a single consumer can also be a wholesale sale if the sale is of a large quantity of goods. There is no dispute that bulk sale to a single consumer may constitute wholesale sale and the price for such sales should be taken as the normal price basis for determining the assessable value of the goods. But in this case there is no finding that the sale was in bulk to any particular consumer.

( 2 ) IT has been argued on behalf of the Revenue that the sales were to industrial consumers. Therefore, it should be inferred that the sales were in bulk and consequently the price paid by the consumers was wholesale price.

( 3 ) WE are unable to uphold this contention. There is no finding by the tribunal that the assessee made only bulk sales at wholesale price to industrial consumers. There is no presumption of law that a sale to an industrial concern must be in bulk and the price charged must be wholesale price. Any such inference will have to be drawn from the facts of the case. The tribunal has examined the facts and has come to a different conclusion. Having regard to the findings made by the tribunal, we are unable to hold that any error of law or fact has been committed by the tribunal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top