SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 957

D.P.WADHWA, S.C.AGRAWAL
Collector Of Central Excise, Bhubaneswar – Appellant
Versus
Re-rolling Mills – Respondent


( 1 ) THE learned counsel for the parties do not dispute that this appeal is covered by the decision of this court in Union of India v. Jain Shudh Vanaspati Ltd. In that case the court was dealing with Section 28 of the Customs Act which is in pari materia with Section 11-A of the central excise Act. The said decision is thus applicable to the present case also. For the reasons given in the said judgment, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top