SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 1484

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
AUTO ENGINEERING WORKS
Vs.
Bansal Trading Company
Decided on December 10, 1999

The court emphasized the importance of complying with the provisions of Order VII Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code, which require the return of the plaint to the appellant for presentation to the proper forum when the court lacks territorial jurisdiction.

Headnote:

Jurisdiction - Civil Procedure Code - The court held that the trial court and the high court erred in not returning the plaint to the appellant for presentation to the proper forum, as required by Order VII Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court directed the plaint to be returned to the appellant for presentation to the proper forum and for the trial court to decide the case on its own merits.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant filed a money suit in the court, but the trial court declined to exercise power under Order VII Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code and did not return the plaint to the appellant for presentation to the proper forum. The appeal to the high court also failed.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the trial court and the high court erred in not returning the plaint to the appellant for presentation to the proper forum, as required by Order VII Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court directed the plaint to be returned to the appellant for presentation to the proper forum and for the trial court to decide the case on its own merits.

Issues: Jurisdiction, Application of Order VII Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code

Ratio Decidendi: The trial court and the high court erred in not returning the plaint to the appellant for presentation to the proper forum, as required by Order VII Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the court directed the plaint to be returned to the appellant for presentation to the proper forum and for the trial court to decide the case on its own merits.

( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the parties on I. A. Nos. 1 and 2. Delay in filing the application (I. A. No. 2) to bring on record the legal representatives of the sole proprietor of the petitioner firm is condoned. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the legal representatives being brought on record. The application (I. A. No. 1) is accordingly, allowed. The index shall be corrected.

( 2 ) LEAVE granted.

( 3 ) THE appellant filed a suit in the court of the learned Additional District Judge, west Tripura (Agartala ). It was a money suit. The trial court held that it had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the plaint. The trial court, however, declined to exercise power under Order VII Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code and did not return the plaint to the appellant for presentation to the proper forum, The appeal filed by the appellant before the high court failed on 28/11/1997. Hence, this appeal by special leave.

( 4 ) AFTER hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that the trial court fell in error in not directing the return of the plaint to the appellant for presentation to the proper forum and the high court also likewise fell in the same error. The terms of Order VII Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code are clear and specific. After having found that it had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the plaint, the trial court ought to have returned the plaint to the appellant for presentation to the proper forum. We, therefore, set aside the order of the trial court to the extent it refused to return the plaint to the appellant for presentation to the proper forum and direct that the plaint shall be returned to the appellant for its presentation to the proper forum. After the plaint is so presented to the court having jurisdiction, the case shall be decided by the trial court in accordance with law on its own merits.

( 5 ) WE record the submission of learned counsel for the appellant that the plaint shall be presented to the District court at Alipore, West Bengal and direct the parties to appear before the said District court on 28/01/2000.

( 6 ) THE trial court shall proceed with the trial of the suit uninfluenced by any observations made by the trial court or the high court. We express no opinion on the merits of the case.

( 7 ) THE appeal is accordingly allowed in the above terms. There will be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top