SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 67

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, H.K.SEMA
Nisar Khan @ Guddu – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttaranchal – Respondent


Judgment

Sema, J.—These two appeals are directed against a common judgment of the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital dated 5.8.2004 confirming the order of the trial court convicting the five appellants under Sections 149, 302/149 IPC and a fine of Rs. 10,000/-; in default two years’ RI. They were further convicted under Section 25 of the Arms Act and Section 148 IPC and sentenced to three years’ RI respectively and a fine amounting to Rs. 1,000/-; in default one year’s RI. It was further directed that all the sentences would run concurrently.

2. Criminal Appeal No. 137 of 2005 has been preferred by three accused, A1-Nisar Khan alias Guddu, A2-Gulzar Khan alias Pappu and A3-Bhura alias Shakil. Criminal Appeal No. 138 of 2005 has been preferred by two accused, A4-Rajesh Sharma and A5-Navin Sharma. The trial court convicted A4-Rajesh Sharma and A5-Navin Sharma under Section 302/149 IPC and sentenced them to death. However, on appeal the High Court set aside the death sentence imposed upon A4 and A5 and converted the death sentence into life imprisonment.

3. No appeal has been preferred by the State of Uttaranchal against the order of the High Court converting the death sentence of A4









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top