S.B.SINHA, P.K.BALASUBRAMANYAN
L. K. Verma – Appellant
Versus
HMT. LTD. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. Sinha, J.—Leave granted.
2. The Appellant was employed by the Respondent herein as a Safety Officer. On an allegation that he had committed acts of misconduct, he was placed under suspension. He preferred an appeal before the Labour Commissioner in terms of Rule 14 of the U.P. Factories (Safety Officers) Rules, 1984 (for short “the Rules”).
3. A writ petition was filed by him which was disposed of directing that the appeal preferred by him against the order of suspension be disposed of by the Labour Commissioner within the period specified therein. On completion of enquiry, a show cause notice was issued to him on 8.01.1998 as to why punishment of dismissal be not awarded.
4. In the meanwhile, the Labour Commissioner issued notice to the Respondent directing it to appear on 2.4.1998. A prayer for adjournment made by the Respondent herein that the matter be posted after 15.4.1998 as the officers were busy in relation to closing of financial year, was refused 9.4.1998 was the date fixed for hearing of the parties which was a holiday. The memo of appeal was also not furnished to the Respondent. In the meanwhile, upon considering the show cause filed by the Appellant, herein,
Kanak (Smt.) and Another v. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad and Others
Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. v. N.N. Narawade etc.
Muriadih Colliery v. Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union
State of H.P. and Others v. Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd. and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.