SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 773

D.P.WADHWA, S.B.MAJMUDAR
M. I. Builders Private LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Radhey Shyam Sahu – Respondent


(1) HAVING heard learned counsel for the parties it is directed that the personal effects and goods belonging to the applicant M.I. Builders which are lying in the premises and which are not affixed to the built structures and which would include loose stocks and other items mentioned in paragraph 2 of these I.As including moveable machinery, if any, will be permitted to be removed by the applicant at its own cost in the presence of officers of Lucknow Mahapalika. The air conditioner, even if affixed to the structure, will also be permitted to be removed.

(2) WE direct the District Magistrate, Lucknow to depute Executive Magistrate of the area or any other officer to remain present to supervise the said exercise. The applicant will be permitted to enter the premises to carry out this work.

(3) BEFORE removing these items a list of items to be removed may be prepared under signatures of representatives of the parties concerned for the purpose of record of the applicants and the other side.

(4) BY consent of parties Monday, the 2/08/1999 is fixed for this exercise to be undertaken on spot from 11.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m. or earlier.

(5) I.AS are dispos

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top