SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1580

M.B.SHAH, V.N.KHARE, B.N.KIRPAL
T. N. Godavarman Thirumulpad – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


(1) I.A. No. 580 Consequent to the seizure of the railway wagons show cause notice dated 6th July, 2000 had been issued to the applicant by the investigating team. The applicant has chosen not to file a reply to the said show cause notice, as according to Mr. Rohtagi, present application has been filed. In our view, it is more appropriate that the questions of fact involved in this application are decided by the S.I.T. who have issued the aforesaid show cause notice. Counsel for the the applicant wants ten days time to file reply to the show cause notice. We grant three weeks time to reply to the show cause notice. On the reply being filed the S.I.T. will, after giving reasonable opportunity to the applicant of being heard and producing evidence if necessary, take a decision within four weeks thereafter. This I.A. is disposed of.

(2) A. No. 604. This is an application seeking modification of the directions issued by the Ministry of Environment and Forests with regard to movement of timber through railways from North Eastern States. If there is any difficulty felt by any consignor with regard to the applicability of the said guidelines, it is open to the consignor, l










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top