SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 837

K.T.THOMAS, R.P.SETHI
Beyas Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K.T.THOMAS, J.

(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) THIS appellant and the other three accused were convicted under Sections 307 and 326 and some other lesser offences of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court affirmed the conviction but reduced the sentence to imprisonment for three years. We are not inclined to interfere with the conviction as the special leave petition filed by the other three accused has been dismissed.

(3) SO far as this appellant is concerned, learned counsel submits that the appellant is now aged 90. In support of that submission he has invited our attention to a medical certificate issued by Dr. R. S. Gupta, Civil Asst. Surgeon who certified that the appellant is 90 years old and is suffering from some diseases mentioned in the certificate. Learned Counsel also submitted that the appellant has undergone imprisonment in connection with this case for a period exceeding two months. Considering the age and physical condition of this appellant we do not think it expedient to put him back in jail. We adopt this case, particularly, when the special leave petition of all the other accused has been dismissed. We, therefore, reduce the se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top