K.T.THOMAS, R.P.SETHI
Beyas Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K.T.THOMAS, J.
(1) LEAVE granted.
(2) THIS appellant and the other three accused were convicted under Sections 307 and 326 and some other lesser offences of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court affirmed the conviction but reduced the sentence to imprisonment for three years. We are not inclined to interfere with the conviction as the special leave petition filed by the other three accused has been dismissed.
(3) SO far as this appellant is concerned, learned counsel submits that the appellant is now aged 90. In support of that submission he has invited our attention to a medical certificate issued by Dr. R. S. Gupta, Civil Asst. Surgeon who certified that the appellant is 90 years old and is suffering from some diseases mentioned in the certificate. Learned Counsel also submitted that the appellant has undergone imprisonment in connection with this case for a period exceeding two months. Considering the age and physical condition of this appellant we do not think it expedient to put him back in jail. We adopt this case, particularly, when the special leave petition of all the other accused has been dismissed. We, therefore, reduce the se
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.