SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 743

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.P.Singh : N.Santosh Hegde
Pramod Mahto
Versus
State Of Bihar
Case No. : 931 of 2001
Date of Decision : 7/31/02

Headnote:Indian Penal Code, 1860-Section 302 - Courts below rightly appreciated the material on record and found the appellant guilty-No adverse inference can be drawn against prosecution merely because names of two PWs were not mentioned in FIR or on the fact that their names were recorded belatedly - Conviction and sentence upheld. (Para 5)

       (1971) 2 SCC 42; (1978) 4 SCC 371 - Referred to.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top