SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 1251

B.N.KIRPAL, N.S.HEGDE, S.N.VARIAVA
Ircon International – Appellant
Versus
Daya Shankar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.N.KIRPAL, J.

(1) SPECIAL leave granted.

(2) THE respondent, as is evident from the facts which emanate from the record, was appointed in a project of the appellant, namely, the Ballast project of the Northern Railways. He was appointed as a khalasi and no formal letter of appointment was issued. In 1988, he was transferred to the head office and by memo dated 29/06/1992, he was informed that his services were no longer required but he was paid compensation as per the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

(3) THE respondent filed a writ petition before the High Court. Before the High Court, an order of this Court dated 2/05/1997 in the case of Sufal Jha and Ors. v. U.O.I. & Ors. was referred to. That was a case where certain persons working at the projects were sought to be retrenched and on concession, it was directed that there will be an offer of appointment to those of the petitioners whose names figure on the panel to be prepared and they would be offered appointments in any of the project in Madhya Pradesh as and when the vacancies arise.

(4) IT will be seen that in the said order of 2/05/1997, this Court did not






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top