SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 194

G.B.PATTANAIK, R.P.SETHI, S.B.MAJMUDAR, UMESH C.BANERJEE, V.N.KHARE
State of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


ORDER :- It is agreed between the contesting parties that the inter se correspondence between the three States and some documents which are already admitted on record will be marked as regular exhibits in the case.

2. It is clarified that even though these documents are marked as Exhibits on record the truth of the contents will not be treated to have been admitted by the other side.

3. Learned senior counsel Shri F.S. Nariman resumed his arguments at 10.50 p.m. and could not conclude till the Court rose for the day.

4. The matters remained part-heard.

Order accordingly.

FOR CITATION AIR 2000 SC 3511(1)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top