SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 252

G.L.OZA, S.NATARAJAN
State Through Central Bureau Of Investigation – Appellant
Versus
K. K. Jajodia – Respondent


(1) SPECIAL leave petition has been filed against an order passed by the High court of Delhi granting anticipatory bail. Having heard learned Attorney General for the petitioner and Mr Nariman for the respon- dents, it is apparent that the conclusions that have been reached by the learned Judge of the High court on the facts which are yet to be exam- ined at the trial is absolutely uncalled for and the observations made and the conclusions reached shall not in any manner be considered by the court while trying the case. It is further directed that as the respondents have already been released on bail, they shall remain on bail, but shall cooperate with the petitioner for the purposes of investigation. The learned counsel for the respondents states that Shri K.K. Jajodia is in London, but he states that he will be back in India by the end of April. He also states that since he is coming back to India, he and the other respondent will cooperate with the petitioner for the purposes of investigation. We, therefore, direct that by the end of April 1988, when the respondent is in India, the petitioner shall be informed immediately and the bail to the respondents will be subject t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top