SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.P.Sen : B.C.Ray
State Of Punjab
Versus
Kewal Singh
Case No. : 374 of 1988
Date of Decision : 7/18/88
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 - Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Section 3 and 4 - Application for bail - Rejected - Five/six persons wearing police uniforms came in a jeep No. entered GOs Mess and made attempt on life , then Director-General of Police who along with his wife was having a stroll in lawn - In encounter that followed two police per- sonnel, keeping guard at Mess, lost their lives - Accused persons ultimately escaped after an encounter by Firing shots - Designated Court, by its order dated granted bail to accused on ground that no role was attributed to him and it could not be said at that stage, if an offence under S. 3 and 4 of Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 was made out against him – Held, Court are of view that High court had no jurisdiction to entertain an application for bail under S. 439 of Code - See: Usmanbhai Dawoodbhai Memon v. State of Gujarat - Accordingly grant leave, set aside order passed by High court releasing respondents on bail and direct that they be taken into custody forthwith - Court however wish to make it clear that respondents may move Designated court for grant of bail afresh - Designated court shall deal with such application for bail if filed in light of principles laid down by this court in Usmanbhai Dawoodbhai case – Order accordingly.
(1) IN this appeal by special leave, the only question involved is as to legality and propriety of the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Punjab & Haryana High court dated 4/01/1988 directing the release of the respondent-accused persons on bail.
(2) AT about 6.45 a.m., on 3/10/1986 five/six persons wearing police uniforms came in a jeep No. PAT 471 entered the GOs Mess at Jalandhar and made attempt on the life of Shri J.F. Ribeiro, the then Director-General of Police who along with his wife Smt. Ribeiro was having a stroll in the lawn. In the encounter that followed two police per- sonnel, keeping guard at the Mess, lost their lives. The accused persons ultimately escaped after an encounter by Firing shots. The Designated Court, Jalandhar by its order dated 20/03/1987 granted bail to the accused Kulwant Singh on the ground that no role was attributed to him and it could not be said at that stage, if an offence under S. 3 and 4 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 was made out against him. It, however, rejected the application for bail filed by the remaining accused persons. Thereupon, the respondents moved the High court under S. 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of bail. A learned Single Judge by his order dated 4/01/1988 directed that respondent-accused persons be also enlarged on bail since bail had been granted to the co-accused Kulwant Singh against whom the evidence collected by the Investigating Officer is of the same type. We are of the view that the High court had no jurisdiction to entertain an application for bail under S. 439 of the Code. See: Usmanbhai Dawoodbhai Memon v. State of Gujarat. We accordingly grant leave, set aside the order passed by the High court releasing the respondents on bail and direct that they be taken into custody forthwith.
(3) WE however wish to make it clear that the respondents may move the Designated court for grant of bail afresh. The Designated court shall deal with such application for bail, if filed, in the light of the principles laid down by this court in Usmanbhai Dawoodbhai case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.