SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 291

K.N.SINGH, M.H.KANIA
Narotam Chopra – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Labour Court – Respondent


(1) SPECIAL leave granted.

(2) THE appellant was employed in the Haryana State Electricity Board, his services were terminated. On a dispute raised by him, the State government referred the matter to the Labour court on the question whether the termination of service of the appellant was just and correct and, if not, to what relief he was entitled. The Labour court gave an Award on 25/02/1986 holding that the appellantS termination of service was illegal for the non-compliance of S. 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 inasmuch as the employer failed to give notice and he further failed to pay compensation to the appellant. Even after recording this finding, the Labour court held that the appellant was entitled only to one monthS pay in lieu of period of notice of retrenchment and compensation. The appellant challenged the Labour courtS Award before the High court by means of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The High court dismissed the writ petition in limine. Hence the appellant has approached this court by way of special leave.

(3) ON the admitted facts, the findings recorded by the Labour court clearly show that the appellantS se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top