SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 509

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.N.Venkatachaliah : Ranganath Misra
Damodar Ropeways And Construction Company Private Limited
Versus
Christopher Martin Desgranges Martin
Case No. : 1 of 1989
Date of Decision : 10/6/89
Advocates Appeared: Gambhir Vivek : Ghosh Shankar : Joshi G. : Kumar Praveen : Kumar Vineet : Narang Urmil : Nariman R.S. : Salve H.N. : Sibal Kapil : Sil A.K. : Vaidyanathan C.S.

Advocates:
A.K.Sil, C.S.VAIDYANATHAN, G.JOSHI, HARISH N.SLAVE, KAPIL SIBAL, PRAVIN KUMAR, R.S.NARIMAN, SHANKAR GOPAL PAGIRE, URMILA NARANG, VINIT KUMAR, VIVEK GAMBHIR

Headnote:

Civil Procedure Code,1908 – Order XXIII Rule 3 – Agreement of lease - One left behind a will which stipulated setting up of a school for benefit of city of Calcutta and upon his death the will was probated and the executors set up the School - Board of governors of the School among others has the reverend Bishop of City of Calcutta as its Chairman and a retired Major-General of the Indian Army as a Member - Old Association being a body of the old students of School resisted request of School before High court when it applied for acceptance of the agreement of lease - A learned Single Judge while agreeing on principle to accord sanction asked for further details - Division bench made certain directions in an appeal taken to it by the builder and the interim directions form the basis of subject matter of this appeal - During the pendency of the appeal in this court the builder and School entered into a fresh agreement to which the Association is also a party. Under the agreement more favourable terms for the School were stipulated – Held, as court have already stated, built-in area would be available under the agreement and excluding of built-in area which may be set apart for purpose of meeting the prospective lessees who had entered into arrangements with the School, would be available - Out of it the School has been given - Court suggested to one for the builder that the constructed area should be equally divided between School and the builder and on instructions from his client (present in court) said one has fairly agreed to do so – Court are of the view that there should be an escalation clause in regard to the ground rent and once in every ten years escalation of 10 per cent in the annual ground rent beginning should be provided - These three terms in court view sufficiently protect the interests of the School and the Trust - Court accordingly accord permission to Board of Governors to enter into compromise on behalf of the School - Court have not considered it in interests of parties to transmit the matter to Calcutta High court as that would protract matter and order of Single Judge might be challenged in appeal and ultimately dispute may again be brought before this court – Order accordingly.

(1) THIS Civilby special leave is at the instance of a builder who had entered into a contract with the Board of governors of the La Martiniere School at Calcutta in respect of certain immovable property of the School to be taken by the builder on permanent lease.

(2) CHRISTOPHER Martin Desgranges Martin left behind a will which stipulated the setting up of a school for the benefit of the city of Calcutta and upon his death the will was probated and the executors set up the School. The Board of governors of the School (hereinafter Board) among others has the reverend Bishop of the City of Calcutta as its Chairman and a retired Major-General of the Indian Army as a Member. The old Martinians Association (hereinafter Association) being a body of the old students of the School resisted the request of the School before the High court when it applied for acceptance of the agreement of lease of 1981. A learned Single Judge while agreeing on principle to accord sanction asked for further details. The division bench made certain directions in an appeal taken to it by the builder and the interim directions form the basis of subject matter of this appeal.

(3) DURING the pendency of the appeal in this court the builder and the School entered into a fresh agreement on 12/09/1986 to which the Association is also a party. Under the agreement more favourable terms for the School were stipulated, such as - (1 annual payment of ground rent of Rs. 22,000.00 during the period of lease; (2 as against a one-time payment of Rs. 31 lakhs in the 1981 agreement, a recurring annual payment of about Rs. 50 lakhs; and (3 built-in area of 60,000.00 square feet to enable expansion of the School and earning of rental income. Apart from these, it is stated that under the 1981 agreement the School had entered into arrangements with prospective lessees and had received a substantial sum of money by way of advance from them in respect of approximately 53,000.00 square feet to be constructed. The builder under 1986 agreement took the responsibility of dealing with the prospective lessees either by refunding the money or providing leasehold area from out of its share.

(4) IT is not disputed that a total area of about 1,80,000.00 square feet would be available as a result of the construction agreed to be raised by the builder under the 1986 agreement. Parties decided to file an application for compromise before this court in the pending appeal and the petition was duly drawn up on 12/09/1986. It was signed on behalf of the Board by the Chairman and Major General B.M. Bhattacharya, Anjan Dey in his personal capacity and as President of the Association and the builder. Mr. Anjan DeyS signature in his personal capacity was duly attested by Mr. P.L. Agarwal, his advocate and his signature as President of the Association was duly witnessed by Mr. Shankar Kar, secretary of the Association. This application was, however, not presented in this court until some time in May 1989, for difficulties which have been attempted to be explained by the School. After this application was made the Association represented by Mr. Amit Bikram Roy resisted it. Rejoinders have been filed on behalf of the School and the builder to the objection. The original compromise petition has been produced. The builder has also placed on record the proceedings of the Board of the Association dated 11/09/1986 a day before the compromise was signed. The resolution of the AssociationS Board reads thus:

"RESOLVED that in view of finalisation of pending case at Supreme court of India regarding dispute arising out of property development at La Martiniere for Boys, Calcutta as petitioned by Developer/Contractor Damodar Ropeways & Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. with one of the parties being Mr. Anjan Dey and old Martinians Association, Mr. Anjay Dey be and is hereby authorised to act on behalf of the Association for the compromise solution as drawn up by the AssociationS solic






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top