SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 189

L.M.SHARMA, M.H.KANIA
Gurdev Singh – Appellant
Versus
Surinder Kumar Sharma – Respondent


(1) THIS is an appeal by a tenant against a judgment of the High court of Punjab and Haryana confirming a decree of eviction passed against him. There were two grounds on which eviction was sought. The first ground was that there was default in the payment of rent as con- templated in S. 13(2(1 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973. The contention of the tenant is that this default could not furnish a ground for eviction as he deposited all the arrears of rent within fifteen days of the first date of hearing. The summons in the eviction proceedings was served on the tenant on 11/06/1976. The appellant-tenant as well as the respondents-landlords appeared in the tri- al court on 16/06/1976 and the case was adjourned to 30/06/1976. On J 30/06/1976, according to the appellant, he was ill and could not remain present. The case was proceeded ex parte and was adjourned to 12/07/1976. On Ju 12/07/1976, two witnesses were examined and the case was adjourned to 23/07/1976. It would thus appear that if the first date of hearing is regarded as 16/06/1976, as held by the High court in the judgment under appeal, the tenant admittedly did not deposit the arrears of


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top