SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 68

KULDIP SINGH, N.M.KASLIWAL
State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Kannan Devan Hills Produce Company LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.VERMA, BABY KRISHNAN, F.S.NARIMAN, G.VISHVANATHA IYER, JOY JOSEPH, K.PARASARAN ATTORNEY, K.R.NAMBIAR, P.K.PALLI, S.BALAKRISHNAN, S.GANESH RAO, S.SUKUMARAN, V.J.Francis

(1) WE have today pronounced judgment in State of Kerala v. Kanan Devon Hills Produce Co. Ltd For the reasons given in the said appeal this appeal has to be allowed. Mr Nariman. learned counsel appearing for the respondent-company raised an additional point in this appeal. He contended that Kuttikanam cannot, in any case, be charged in respect of such timber which was planted by the grantee in the Concession Area. We do not agree with the contention of the learned counsel. The suit out of which this appeal has arisen was decreed by following the judgment of the Kerala High court from which civil no. 1277 of 1979 arose. This appeal has to be dealt with in the same manner as civil no. 1277 of 1979. We allow the appeal with costs. The suit of the respondent is dismissed with costs. We quantify the costs as Rs. 5,000.00.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top