SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 2147

S.P.BHARUCHA, SUHAS C.SEN
Aruna Steel Rolling Mills – Appellant
Versus
Collector Of Central Excise, Madurai – Respondent


(1) THE appellants impugn the judgment and order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate tribunal on the ground that their products, tiebars, fall within Tariff Item 26-AA(i-a) which refers, for our purposes, to bars and all other forged shapes and S. not otherwise specified. Their argument is that the tie-bars are forged. This was not a case that was advanced before the Assistant Collector and no evidence in this behalf was led. The Appellate Collector, in terms, found that the tie-bars under consideration were not manufactured by forging. The tribunal proceeded upon the same basis.

(2) THE appeal must,therefore, be dismissed, with no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top